Pussy Riot and FEMEN performance in front of Russian Pavilion

Personal Reflection

There was something theatrically excessive about the scene: (now already very well known) neon pink balaclavas against the muted elegance of the Giardini, smoke clouds turning the air into a temporary stage set, guitars and chants colliding with the polished rituals of the art world. We know it’s chaotic on purpose. Not designed for contemplation, but interruption. What stayed with me most was the uncomfortable tension between spectacle and sincerity. The action clearly understood the visual language of contemporary art institutions: color, repetition, symbols, performance, virality. At times it almost resembled fashion imagery or a music video. Yet underneath that hyper-visibility was a very direct confrontation with war, nationalism, and cultural diplomacy. The Russian Pavilion itself became more than architecture. It turned into a symbolic object: a reminder that biennales are never politically neutral, even when they pretend to be spaces “above” conflict. The protest questioned whether art institutions can separate culture from state power, especially during ongoing violence. Not quietly, either. Loudly. Publicly. In a way impossible to crop out of Instagram. At the same time, the performance also exposed the strange ecosystem of the Biennale itself. Protest became content almost instantly. Phones were everywhere. Collectors, journalists, tourists, curators: everyone watching, documenting, circulating. The action criticized visibility politics while simultaneously mastering them. That contradiction made it feel contemporary in the truest sense. I also kept thinking about how performance art changes when urgency replaces ambiguity. Much contemporary art invites interpretation; this did not. Its message was immediate and emotionally compressed. Less poetry, more alarm siren. Yet the aesthetic choices, the choreography, the smoke, the repetition of bodies in masks, still created moments that felt visually powerful beyond the slogan itself. It raised a difficult but important question: when institutions absorb protest into their own spectacle, does the protest lose force, or does it infiltrate the institution from within? Maybe both can happen at once.

Tags