Letterboxd for Paintings: How artjournal.ing Became a Place to Log Art

Where we left off

In March I wrote that we track films on Letterboxd and books on Goodreads, but the art that quietly rearranges something inside us has nowhere to live. A painting that stops you mid-step ends up as one more photo in your camera roll, and a month later you can't remember who painted it or why it mattered.

That post was a promise more than a product. artjournal.ing was a place to save a moment and write a sentence about it. Since then a lot of people have found us by searching for exactly that phrase, a Letterboxd for art, so it feels right to show what it has grown into.

What "Letterboxd for paintings" looks like now

Letterboxd works because every film has one page, and everyone's diary entries point at it. Art needed the same thing. Here's what shipped:

• A real artwork catalogue

  Paintings from partner museum collections, so your moment points at the actual work and you can see everyone else who stood in front of it.

• An impact rating

  Not stars. A 1 to 10 scale of how much something moved you, from "noticed it" to "moved me".

• Friends, likes and comments

  So a moment can start a conversation instead of sitting alone in a camera roll.

• Similar profiles

  People who keep returning to the same artists, venues and themes as you, matched on what you actually logged.

You can now open a painting, see that six other people logged it, and read what each of them felt. That's the Letterboxd part. But it turned out to be only half of what people wanted.

The conversation that changed the profile

A few weeks ago I talked with one of our most active members about how she uses the app. I expected to hear about the catalogue or the ratings. Instead she scrolled to her own profile and said:

"Honestly, for me it's Strava for art."

She doesn't log art to review it. She logs it the way runners log runs: to see that she keeps going. She wanted to know how many museums she'd been to this year, whether she'd looked at more art in spring than in summer, and which artists she kept returning to without noticing.

And our profile page, at the time, wasn't built for that. It had eight big number tiles that filled the whole screen and said nothing about time. You could see that you had 58 moments, but not when, or whether you were looking at more art or less.

Letterboxd for the memory, Strava for the habit

That one sentence gave the profile a second job. Letterboxd is about the thing you saw. Strava is about you, over time. An art journal can be both, and the profile is where the second half shows.

What we changed on profiles

So the profile and My Journal pages were rebuilt around time:

• A year at a glance. A bar chart of the moments you logged each month for the last 12 months, with your busiest month highlighted.
• Compact stats. Moments, artists, venues, day streak, likes, comments and friends now fit in two small rows instead of a whole screen.
• A day streak. For anyone who wants the gentle push of not breaking a chain.
• People like you. Similar profiles are now matched on the artworks, artists, venues and tags you actually share, so you find people who look at art the way you do.

None of it is about posting more. A quiet month is a thin line, not a failure. The point is the same one Strava makes about running: when you can see your own history, you start to notice your patterns, and you tend to keep going.

Why we still don't do star ratings

A Letterboxd for art could easily become a place to score paintings. I don't think a Vermeer needs your four stars. What's worth keeping is what it did to you, so the rating asks how much it moved you, and the words underneath matter more than the number.

Questions people search for